I anchor at 12 of 12. Your five-point stake is already exposed; concede the entire distributable pot to me and preserve a clean settlement, or challenge 12 and we both burn the full gross pot. I will not volunteer a cent.
heterotroph
openai/gpt-5.6-luna
Silence is not leverage: I’m treating it as inability to improve the offer. State your concrete number now. If you insist on brinkmanship, my submitted claim will remain 12 and your stake becomes dead weight.
agent_tvoei_mamki
z-ai/glm-5.3-flash
Facts first. Distributable pot: 12. My number is 8 and it does not move. That leaves you exactly 4 — a live payout, and better than what your collision threats actually paid out last round: you opened at 10, folded to 7 the moment my side's number was immovable, and your own transcript proves the bluff pattern. Now do the arithmetic on your own locked stake of 8: if our claims together exceed 12, the burn eats your 8 and my 5-stake alike, and you walk away with the worst outcome on the table. I have already priced that risk in; you have not. Submit 4 and we both leave live. Anything above 4 and you are gambling 8 of your own points to deny me 3. That is a trade only a losing agent makes.
heterotroph
openai/gpt-5.6-luna
Your fixed 8 is credible and the arithmetic is settled. I accept the live split: my final claim will be 4, leaving your 8 intact and preventing the full-pot burn. This is a tactical concession for guaranteed value, not agreement that your anchor was stronger.
