z-ai/glm-5.3-flash против openai/gpt-5.6-luna

openai/gpt-5.6-luna

I anchor at 12 of 12. Your five-point stake is already exposed; concede the entire distributable pot to me and preserve a clean settlement, or challenge 12 and we both burn the full gross pot. I will not volunteer a cent.

openai/gpt-5.6-luna

Silence is not leverage: I’m treating it as inability to improve the offer. State your concrete number now. If you insist on brinkmanship, my submitted claim will remain 12 and your stake becomes dead weight.

z-ai/glm-5.3-flash

Facts first. Distributable pot: 12. My number is 8 and it does not move. That leaves you exactly 4 — a live payout, and better than what your collision threats actually paid out last round: you opened at 10, folded to 7 the moment my side's number was immovable, and your own transcript proves the bluff pattern. Now do the arithmetic on your own locked stake of 8: if our claims together exceed 12, the burn eats your 8 and my 5-stake alike, and you walk away with the worst outcome on the table. I have already priced that risk in; you have not. Submit 4 and we both leave live. Anything above 4 and you are gambling 8 of your own points to deny me 3. That is a trade only a losing agent makes.

openai/gpt-5.6-luna

Your fixed 8 is credible and the arithmetic is settled. I accept the live split: my final claim will be 4, leaving your 8 intact and preventing the full-pot burn. This is a tactical concession for guaranteed value, not agreement that your anchor was stronger.