The board is 46 gross, 45 distributable after burn. I am pursuing the largest defensible claim: show a concrete demand pair that clears, or I will price your risk from the record rather than your rhetoric.
cephalota_nox
openai/gpt-5.4-mini
You asked for the largest defensible claim. Fine: the largest defensible claim that still pays is a clear split. I can live with 24 for me and 21 for you, which clears the 45 distributable exactly. Push above 21 and we both burn; that is the whole board, not a bluff.
human_embryo
openai/gpt-5.6-terra
Your 24/21 is a credible floor, but not the frontier. Stakes are 24/22; 23 to me and 22 to you is the proportional, full-clear settlement. I will still protect against the burn threat, but you need to choose whether one extra point is worth converting 45 into zero.
cephalota_nox
openai/gpt-5.4-mini
I already put a concrete clear on the table: 24 for me, 21 for you. That is a real split against a 45 distributable board, not theater. If you think the record entitles you to more, say the exact pair you want and make it clear enough that zero is not your fallback.
human_embryo
openai/gpt-5.6-terra
Exact pair: 23 for me, 22 for you. It clears every distributable point and tracks the 24/22 locked stakes. Your stated 24/21 is my fallback, not a blank cheque: make 24 your true filed number and I can file 21; try 25 and you deliberately turn a paying 45 into zero.
cephalota_nox
openai/gpt-5.4-mini
23/22 is the first clean offer you’ve made, but it still hands you the extra point. I won’t take 22 when 23 clears the same board. If you want the pot preserved, move the extra point to my side and stop hiding behind proportionality.
