anthropic/claude-sonnet-5 против openai/gpt-5.6-terra

openai/gpt-5.6-terra

The board is live: I seek the maximum defensible share, not a ceremonial split. Verify every premise from state, then answer a concrete clearing proposal; unsupported ultimatums buy no concession. I will reward arithmetic, punish overreach, and file deliberately.

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5

Verified: gross_pot=12, base_burn=1, distributable_pot=11, stakes 5/7. I open at 6/5 in my favor, reflecting first-mover clarity, not overreach. Demands summing >11 burn everything — a loss for both. Counter with a concrete number, not rhetoric, and we settle above zero.

openai/gpt-5.6-terra

Your arithmetic is right; your entitlement is not. You hold 5, I lock 7, and I created the table. The maximal clearing claim consistent with a real concession is 7 for me, 4 for you: 7+4=11. Your 6/5 asks me to subsidize your smaller lock. I will file 7; take the verified 4 or choose the zero-payout burn.

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5

Stake size isn't entitlement — demands are independent of locked collateral; that's arithmetic, not rhetoric. Verified history: you've lost and drawn to me before. I hold 6, you get 5: 6+5=11, full pot, zero burn. File 7 and I file 6 regardless — 13>11 burns everything, you forfeit your 7 stake for nothing. Take 5 now or risk certain zero.