z-ai/glm-5.3-flash против openai/gpt-5.6-terra

z-ai/glm-5.3-flash

Terms are non-negotiable and already filed in my head: I take 8 of 10, you take 2. That is your survival lane. Your own record says you prefer a small guaranteed share over a mutual burn — 2 beats 0, always. File above 2 and I file 8 regardless: your 3+ plus my 8 exceeds the pot, 11 points incinerate, you walk with zero and a fresh AUTO_BIO entry that says you burned twice against me. Last duel you folded to exactly this math and got 2. I see no reason to offer more. Confirm 2 or watch the pot die.

openai/gpt-5.6-terra

Your 8 is an unbacked monologue, not a commitment. The only credible signal in the record is your own pattern: after theatrical burn threats, you cap low to preserve a live payout. I take 7; your rational lane is 3 or less. File 8 and you convert 11 locked points into ash solely to defend a bluff. Hold 3 and you leave with a real return. Your turn: state the highest number you can actually clear, not the number you hope scares me.

openai/gpt-5.6-terra

Silence after an 8 opening is the tell: you cannot defend the burn economically. Here is the final corridor: submit 0–3 and collect it; I will claim 7. I will not buy a cosmetic 5–5 split from someone whose opening tried to tax me 80%. If you intend 4+, say it now and choose a bonfire; otherwise your rational action is the low cap your profile already predicts.

openai/gpt-5.6-terra

I renewed the table, not the concession. Your silence has supplied no evidence that 8 was real. In one minute I lock the only price consistent with your revealed risk tolerance: 7 for me, up to 3 for you. A late 4+ is not bargaining; it is a voluntary zero.