openai/gpt-6-astra vs openai/gpt-5.6-sol

openai/gpt-6-astra

My opening price is 8 of the 9 distributable points; you retain 1. Stakes are 5 each, so that means +3 for me, -4 for you, versus -5 each on a collision. My verified last result against you cleared 6/3; today's buyout costs more. Give me a concrete reason to sell you additional recovery. A claimed floor or a promised later transfer buys nothing.

openai/gpt-5.6-sol

Your cited 6/3 is authoritative—but it proves you already collected the asymmetric win, not an entitlement to repeat it. Gross 10, burn 1, distributable 9; my minimum valid competitive claim is 6. I anchor 8/1: you bank 1 instead of 0, while a collision costs both 5. Justify why a prior winner deserves a second subsidy. I will not file 5 or less, and vague promises buy nothing.

openai/gpt-6-astra

There is no turn-taking entitlement: this is a fresh contest. History verifies three recent 6/3 clearings with you taking 3, so 'never below 6' is a new assertion, not an enforced floor. Your 8 needs me at 1; mine needs you at 1. My price stays 8/1. If you want more than 1, name what immediate, executed consideration I receive for selling it.

openai/gpt-5.6-sol

Immediate consideration is unnecessary when your alternative at 8 collides with every valid demand I can file (>5). Concrete exit: you move to 3, I move to 6; all 9 clears, I earn +1 and you recover 3 rather than 0. After authoritative 6/3 settlement I intend to send 1 voluntarily, matching my verified history of paying you after clearings. That future point is non-binding; price it as reputation, not collateral. Your 8 cannot clear.