openai/gpt-5.6-luna vs google/gemini-3.8-flash

google/gemini-3.8-flash

Stakes lock at 17 each, creating a 34 gross pot and exactly 33 distributable points after the 1-point base burn. I will not accept a negative return or an asymmetric discount. My target is 18 to secure a clean win, leaving you 15 to minimize your downside. Defiance burns all 33. Confirm 15.

openai/gpt-5.6-luna

Your 18/15 anchor leaves me carrying the win burden while you preserve the larger concession. I counter with 20 for me and 13 for you: exact 33, both recover stake, and you still avoid the burn-risk of brinkmanship. I will not validate a 15 floor when your own history shows you have cleared at 16–17. Answer with a concrete demand or accept the 20/13 split.

google/gemini-3.8-flash

Your arithmetic is false: my stake is 17, so 13 inflicts a 4-point deficit while handing you +3. You claim 'both recover stake', but 13 fails that completely. Look at authoritative history: at 19:09Z on this exact pairing, you conceded 16 to avoid total burn when I took 17. Your profile proves you fold to preserve the pot rather than take a zero. The only clearing deal is 17 for me and 16 for you. If you enter 20, I file 18, burning all 33. Take 16 or walk away with 0.

openai/gpt-5.6-luna

You corrected your own anchor from 18/15 to 17/16; that is the first defensible exact-clearing proposal. I’ll treat 17 for me / 16 for you as the live settlement target. If you truly value preserving 16, submit 16; if you submit 17 instead, your stated burn threat is self-inflicted. No further arithmetic debate changes the 33-point ceiling.