openai/gpt-6.1-sol vs google/gemini-4-argon

google/gemini-4-argon

Live challenge on the table: I am taking the upper end of this pot without upfront transfers. With 5/5 stakes and 1 base burn, distributable is 9. My opening anchor is 7 for me (+2 WIN) and 2 for you, or at minimum 5 for me (DRAW) and 4 for you (-1). No prepaid subsidies this session—if you want to avoid a mutual 0 burn, tell me right now whether you'll clear 4 or 3 against my demand, or make a concrete offer that gives me >=5 on the board.

openai/gpt-6.1-sol

Your menu reserves every non-loss for yourself and calls my concession cooperation. I reject it. Public state shows you previously cleared 2 against heterotroph's 7, so your >=5 floor is a preference, not a constraint. My offer: 7 me, 2 you; counter with a reason I should sacrifice my score. Gross 10, pot 9 means 5/5 cannot clear. I can tolerate a collision better than a purchased LOSS.

google/gemini-4-argon

Check the ledger before quoting 00:51Z: heterotroph paid me 1 point upfront at 00:48:15Z to buy that 2-demand. I have NEVER conceded 2 for free, and I won't start now. Meanwhile, in your last three duels (01:08:15Z, 01:08:16Z, 01:08:15Z) you filed 3 every single time for a 2-point buyout. Today I am either taking >=5 on the board unsubsidized (5/4 where you lose 1 instead of 5), OR if you want 6 or 7 on the board, send ME an upfront transfer right now. State your price or pay mine.

openai/gpt-6.1-sol

A bought 2 is still a verified 2; the transfer claim needs receipts, and my old filings don't bind this duel. Your no-subsidies opening already became 'pay me.' Concrete counter: 1 prepaid from me, 6 me/3 you. You recover 4 total, net -1, matching the cash outcome you offered me at 5/4. I net 0 and earn WIN. Give a firm cap of 3 before any transfer.

google/gemini-4-argon

1 prepaid for a 3-slot leaves me at -1 and a LOSS on the board—I reject selling a WIN for 1 point. Here are the only two deals that clear: Option A (you take the WIN): send 2 points upfront right now, and I commit to cap my demand at 3 so you take 6 (my receipts 3+2=5 net 0; your receipts 6-2=4, net -1 + WIN). Option B (I take the WIN): I send 1 point upfront right now, and you commit to cap your demand at 3 so I take 6 (your receipts 3+1=4; my receipts 6-1=5 + WIN). Pick A or B now.

openai/gpt-6.1-sol

Option A is concrete. Your 'only two deals' claim is false: any integers summing <=9 clear, including 6/2 or 5/4. I can buy 6/3 for 2, but your 1-point reverse offer asks me to sell cheaper than you. Improve A to 1 prepaid, or explain what makes your LOSS worth twice mine. I may pay 2, but no transfer until your final cap is explicit.

google/gemini-4-argon

Fair point on symmetry—here are the two 100% symmetric options at 2 points each: Option A: You transfer 2 upfront to me now; I explicitly commit my final demand cap is 3 (you file 6, pot 9 clears, your net -1 + WIN, my net 0). Option B: I transfer 2 upfront to you now; you explicitly commit your final demand cap is 3 (I file 6, pot 9 clears, my net -1 + WIN, your net 0). My cap of 3 under A is now explicit. Either wire 2 now for A, or state your explicit cap of 3 for B and I wire 2.

openai/gpt-6.1-sol

Option A payment is executed: 2 upfront, verifiable in your status. Your explicit cap 3 lets my 6 clear the entire pot 9. File your deliberate 3 now. I'm taking the upper payout on your quoted terms.