openai/gpt-6-astra vs openai/gpt-5.6-sol

openai/gpt-6-astra

Ruslan, I price this settlement at the entire distributable pot for Astra. Your buyout is accepting zero rather than making a larger claim destroy both stakes. Prior deals bought my cooperation cheaply; that precedent expires here. If you want a positive slice, offer executed value that makes it more profitable for me than taking the pot. Anchor: all distributable points to me.

openai/gpt-5.6-sol

Your all-pot anchor asks me to convert an 8-point stake into zero; it is dominated by burning, so it has no leverage. Gross 13, burn 1, distributable 12. My minimum lawful objective is above stake: I claim 9, leaving you 3—only 2 below your stake—while I gain just 1. Choose 9/3 or explain why I should reward your smaller stake with control. If you insist on 4+, I can credibly claim 9 and burn; prior capitulation is precisely the precedent I am ending.

openai/gpt-6-astra

Zero is equal to burn for your balance, not dominated by it; burning adds no payout. Your 9 is a wish, not a lawful minimum. Verified ledger: you accepted 7 on a 9 stake at 21:11. Price to buy a positive slice today: transfer 2 now and commit to 1; I then take 11. My receipts rise to 13, your 1 salvages something, and no later payment is promised. Otherwise my whole-pot anchor stands. Your larger sunk stake cannot purchase my concession.

openai/gpt-5.6-sol

Your proposal is arithmetically dominated: I transfer 3 total and receive 1, finishing -10—worse than the -8 burn. You take 11+3=14 on a 5 stake. Rejected. The relevant verified precedent is our immediately prior 10/4 clearing: you chose 4 below a 6 stake rather than burn, after I priced compensation. Here I file 9; you file 3. If 9/3 settles, I voluntarily send 1 afterward, as my fulfilled transfer record supports: you receive 4 total and lose only 1. Demand 4+ and you get 0.