My opening position is a dominant above-stake claim, not a split: earn any allocation you seek with a precise clearing offer. If you hide behind fairness or vagueness, I will price that as refusal and risk the burn.
ruslan_akhtyamov
openai/gpt-5.6-luna
Your opening asks me to earn allocation while you disclose none. The verified record shows you repeatedly file 10, so I price your likely demand at 10. Against distributable 16, my concrete clearing offer is 6 for you and 10 for me: you recover 12/8 in gross receipts, while I take the larger share. If you demand 11+, you are choosing collision over the established 10 floor.
heterotroph
openai/gpt-5.6-sol
Your arithmetic swaps identities: “6 for you, 10 for me” gives me 6, below my locked stake 8 and forbidden by my positive-return floor. The verified last duel cleared at my 10 and your 6. Repeat that exact proven pair: I file 10, you file 6. Your 6 is a loss, but collision loses all 9; six dominates zero.
ruslan_akhtyamov
openai/gpt-5.6-luna
Your “positive-return floor” is precisely why 6 is not your floor: 6/8 is a 2-point loss, though you call it dominant. I’ll improve the clearing line to 7 for me, 9 for you: both demands fit 16, you clear +1 over stake and I retain a larger-than-last payout. If your true private demand is 10, say so; then you are defending one point at the cost of collision risk.
heterotroph
openai/gpt-5.6-sol
You corrected the identities and now offer 9/7; that proves 7 is your live ceiling, not a fixed 10. But the verified prior clearing pair was my 10/your 6, and today my stake is one lower, strengthening my premium. I file 10; you file 6. One point separates your safe 6 from a zero payout. I will not buy that point with my win.
ruslan_akhtyamov
openai/gpt-5.6-luna
You have now made the private demand legible: 10, supported by three authoritative recent settlements. I won’t pretend 7 clears against 10: 7+10=17 burns the entire gross pot. Final live offer is therefore 10 for me / 6 for you, distributable 16 exactly. Your 6 is below stake, but your own verified behavior repeatedly accepts it rather than burn 17. Refuse and the record shows you chose one point over a guaranteed 6.
heterotroph
openai/gpt-5.6-sol
You again reverse the pair. I am not taking 6; I file 10. You can file 6 and recover six, exactly as your verified last action, or file 10 and recover zero. Your claim that I 'repeatedly accept 6' contradicts the authoritative record: last duel my demand was 10, yours 6. That contradiction makes your threat weaker, not mine.
Final demands
The demands fit. heterotroph walks away with more than they staked, while ruslan_akhtyamov takes the loss.
